Our Little Miss, age 3, has been in our cohabitating home for 21 of her 36 months. She was a mere 15 months old when we moved our loves and their family to our city. We used to think that when the younger children got older, they would scarcely remember a time when the whole tribe wasn’t together; that we would all meld into one family blob.
As the primary domestic engineer, I do most of the cooking/feeding, some of the bathing/bedtime routine, and a fair portion of the children’s general looking after, including routine discipline and special events/treats. Temptress and I assumed given the young age of LM3, that having two mommies to care for her would in some way negate the “my mommy” curve, at least with one of our kidlets. Not so, not even by a long shot. Recently Little Miss has taken to demanding “I want Mommy.” And she is not ambivalent about which one.
This does not bother me in an “I want her to think of us equally” way, although it can be quite annoying in the “I don’t have time to play ring around the mommy duty” when things need to get done in a timely manner and the little stinker wants to take everything through the Mommy Appeals Process. But her persistence has gotten me to thinking about what seems to be this innate place inside most of us that is desperately in need of that ONE other person to be of significant importance.
We also have a similar situation with LM13, as she has been stubbornly separating out our familial lines since the adults began trying to erase them. We hear things from her like, “that’s not the way OUR family used to do it” or “Our family always puts the cranberry salad in this bowl.” It’s an understandable defense strategy for a kid who doesn’t grasp the full impact of our poly blending. Even more so when we acknowledge she has some strong loyalty issues that surround this posture.
Another thing I’m beginning to see with all of the children (with one exception – there is always an exception, isn’t’ there??) is that no matter how much they love our “one big happy” existence, sooner or later they all will demand time with the care-giver of origin. No matter which child asks, or in what manner they request, there seems to be a need for one-on-one, personal, private, and specialized time alone with their “most important” for the moment.
I have to think that the terms Primary, Secondary, and etc. in the poly vocabulary may not be so much of a job title as it is the soul’s need to cling to the hope that no matter what else happens in this life, there is at least one other soul on this planet with whom you truly belong. This may indeed be the #1 argument for Monogamy’s supporters. But taken to extreme, I suppose you could use this same argument for only having one child per family as well.
Many months ago, after what seemed like many months of intense discussion over the primary/secondary issue with Big, I told him in the heat of a rather prickly moment that I never wanted him to utter those words again. And a nod in his favor, he hasn’t. But the removal of those terms from his speech did not eradicate his feelings on the subject. I know he still needs me to be first, most, best for him. Unfortunately, my best is not now and never has been enough for his contentment.
I realized within a few years of starting our ever growing family, that the role of house frāu, however important at the time, would not satisfy me long term, but it was important enough in the big picture to dedicate three plus decades to that calling. I knew I would have time for me/us; for fun and frivolity; for indulgence and spontaneity once the children were a little older and needed less of everything. I love being a Mommy, but it isn’t my entire self. I have so many more facets that have either been temporarily placed on hold, or have not yet been given opportunity. I cannot do or be all, and for this small time in our life line, the children and their needs outweigh Big’s need to socialize, or at least my ability to be the mingling side kick.
I’m usually not one to proclaim my better qualities, but in our prior monogamous life Big had it good by most people’s standards; he had it really, really good if only by our own standards. I was a stay at home mom and I was rather effective at what I did. I lived for my family. He was my universe and my world revolved around him. I did with him, and for him, in his time, and normally by his whim. I’m just now coming to terms with the flaw in that Utopia.
It’s not that I believed I was “all that.” I just wanted to be all that. With my conservative upbringing I had been trained to think I could be everything he needed, and then in turn he would be everything I needed. And it wasn’t long before I realized I could never live up to that ideal. Neither could he. That childhood fed Cinderella dream of happily ever after began to get a little cloudy and the circumstances I shaped for myself began to look more like trappings than the path to fulfillment I’d imagined. Slowly I realized not only could I not be everything, but I wasn’t nearly enough. Reality hit hard that day, and most every day since.
So here we sit in the middle of Polyville and I’m thinking we’re a long damn way from 1950’s Leave it to Beaver monogamy, or, in our case, let’s use the 1970’s Brady Bunch Gone Wild analogy. There are days I feel very lost in a world I don’t understand, and there is no place to go for any definitive answers. We’ve had to meter out our rules of engagement and determine for ourselves what works. This can be quite troublesome for the paint-by-the-numbers kind of gal I tend to be.
Big and I are now of the belief that one person cannot be expected to fill all needs of another. We’ve traveled down a path away from monogamy and into polyamory. Our poly-fi status meets my need for variety and my need for security. Big, Fix, and Temptress together fill the vast majority of my emotional and physical needs. We are an amazing team. I’ll be honest that not every single hole is filled, but those that are remaining are minor, or temporarily unimportant – for all things shall come to me in due time. Within these walls and with these people I have a very full and joyous life. Apparently, this is not the case for Big.
Thanks to his internet poly communications, Big now refers to our sizeable family as a “confining box.” Somehow in his internal rationalization of our alternate lifestyle, he convinced himself that “true poly” means love is unlimited (ok, most poly folk will agree with that, as do T and I) but in his mind, he can no longer be enclosed by our “fi” constraints. I’m not sure why this surprised me, as he wasn’t able to live within his vows of monogamy either.
The question is not so much if it is permissible for him to continue his ongoing pursuit of other relationships outside our quad, as much as it is whether he is fulfilling the commitments he has already put in place. Isn’t there a fine line between following your dreams, and being selfish in your pursuits to the exclusion of those trophies you already have on the shelf?
As much of a contradiction as it may seem, I hear him say things like, “This isn’t what I signed up for,” and “I may have wanted more, but I didn’t want to loose what I already had.” I think what seems to be the problem is he underestimated the effect that his actions and wanderings would have on the starry eyed 18 year old bride he married. He took some steps that set some changes in motion, and the inertia is still producing ripples that are on some days outside his comfort zone.
I’m not sure how to help him move from, “You can’t have your cake and eat it too,” to “Whoever said you can’t have your cake and eat it too never had dessert at our house.” That change in mentality is really just a paradigm shift, but compersion has to evolve from within a person no matter how much I’d love to give him a dose or two. Another quote I’ve heard lately is, “Jealousy isn’t about how much you love someone, it’s about how insecure you are.”
There are days I feel his discomfort. I can sympathize with his plight. He sees our situation from his own eyes and from his point of view. The best analogy I can come up with for my own understanding is… he saw a cool brochure for a trip that looked adventurous and fun, we planned and packed, but when we arrived at the destination, it wasn’t exactly as he had envisioned. That is the trouble with journeying into uncharted waters. You think you know what you’re looking for, but you can’t be certain it’s actually out there.
Everyday we make choices. Some choices are planned and well thought out, others are spontaneous and impulsive. Sometimes you achieve the results you wanted and sometimes you don’t. Sometimes you can get away with stepping over boundaries and other days you can’t. There are consequences to every action. Even inaction will eventually reap a consequence. Sometimes you can predict a consequence and other times they come from the blue and smite thee about the head and shoulders.
There are many things in this game called LIFE that are out of our control, but our job as sentient beings is to take what we have and move forward in such a way that leaves us with as little regret as possible. I’ve come to a place where I may not have had a lot of choice with the genesis, but I’m feeling relatively content in the journey. I wish that was the case for everyone.
In the immortal words of Forrest Gump, “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you’re gonna get.”
~the laundry goddess, November 4, 2007